Yes: lovely, lovely response. We are all doing our damn best right now, and while I, too, appreciate that digital playmaking is an inadequate response to an unprecedented challenge, playing the purity card is not particularly helpful. As you rightly point out, there has *always* been sloppy theatre work. It’s just easier to stream in this moment. There are, though, three babies here that I wouldn’t throw out with the bathwater: 1) I do think it’s important that we give ourselves permission *not* to make work if that’s what we need right now. In other words, are we rushing to present plays on Zoom because we think we can find some genuine artistic connection that way (as you seem to have, impressively, done) or because we simply can’t imagine doing anything different? I think many people are feeling the need to give themselves permission, in this total failure of capitalism, to just stop. We want to recognize our grief (as evidenced by the popularity of that particular pull-quote), though doing so certainly shouldn’t be our endgame. 2) Anything done hastily risks being bad. As you point out, lots of folks have been intentionally curating virtual performance work for a long time. As with online learning efforts, we should be looking to the people who were already there for guidance, not rushing in and assuming competence in someone else’s medium just because ours has been cut off. And 3) I would offer that for a lot of artists — and this is where perhaps I agree with both of you? — our creative skills are equally, if not *more* vital right now in envisioning new paths forward for society than they are in making stuff. I love making plays and I know that is a form of cultural visioning. But also, writing, and brainstorming, and organizing are places where we can channel our creative energies so that we actually have a future to create theatre *in*. But my real wonder in all of this is… wait, that was a pseudonym? Why claim to be a truth-teller and then obscure your identity? What gives?